- AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY
- PLOT SUMMARY
- HISTORICAL CONTEXT
- CRITICAL OVERVIEW
- FURTHER READING
AMIRI BARAKA 1964
In 1964, the Writers’ Stage Theatre in New York City staged the first production of Amiri Baraka’s satirical one-act play about religion, The Baptism. The play was presented and published under Baraka’s given name, LeRoi Jones. According to Tish Dace and Andrew O. Jones in the Reference Guide to American Literature, the play “jarred and amused its spectators” but also “drew charges of both obscenity and blasphemy.” That year, Baraka began garnering attention as a major playwright, with a number of his other plays also opening, including the Obie Award-winning Dutchman. The Baptism was also published in 1967, together with an earlier Baraka play, under the title The Baptism and The Toilet.
The Baptism is a challenging play on a number of levels. For example, some of the language and subject matter is of an adult nature and offensive to some. In addition, the characters are less individuals than they are representations of particular groups or ideas. The play begins with a minister’s attempts to encourage a homosexual to change his ways. A boy comes to the church to be baptized, but his sins become a heated topic of discussion, launching angry accusations and a violent end. Throughout the play, the boy’s identity remains a question and a source of strife for the other characters—is he simply a clever teenager, skilled at deception, or is he actually some sort of deity, maybe even Christ?
Amiri Baraka was born Everett LeRoy Jones on October 7, 1934, in Newark, New Jersey. (He changed LeRoy to LeRoi in the early 1950s.) His family was solidly middle class; his father, Coyette Leroy Jones, was a postal worker and an elevator operator, and his mother, Anna Lois Russ Jones, was a social worker. He was one of the few black students at his high school.
Jones started college at Rutgers University on a science scholarship but later transferred to the predominantly black Howard University in Washington, D.C., where he studied philosophy, religion, German, and English literature. While Jones gained a broad understanding of literature and art from his studies at Howard under the tutelage of such prominent African-American intellectuals as Sterling Brown and E. Franklin Frazier, he would later accuse the university of encouraging limited and bourgeois thinking among African Americans. During college and in later years, he was a voracious reader of such poets as William Carlos Williams, Walt Whitman, and T. S. Eliot. In 1954, Jones enlisted in the United States Air Force and served, primarily in Puerto Rico and Germany, as a weatherman and B-36 gunner.
Jones’s return to civilian life in 1957 occurred at a time when many artists were experimenting with new ideas and forms as well as challenging traditional political thinking and social institutions. He moved to the bohemian neighborhood of Greenwich Village in New York City, where he started the literary journal Yugen and the Totem Press with his Jewish wife, Hettie Cohen Jones. Through this work, Baraka encountered such radically experimental writers as Allen Ginsberg, Gregory Corso, Jack Kerouac, and William S. Burroughs—often referred to as the Beat poets. Baraka began hosting informal gatherings in his home where these and others would come to drink, argue, and listen to jazz played by such musicians as Ornette Coleman and Don Cherry. During this period, Jones wrote extensively and contributed to numerous journals and magazines on a wide variety of topics. One of the first works for he which received widespread attention was his 1961 poetry collection entitled Preface to a Twenty-Volume Suicide Note. The book established Jones as a new voice in American poetry, expressing his discontent with the political and racial climate in the United States through jazz-influenced verses.
The Writers’ Stage Theatre in New York City first produced Jones’s play The Baptism in 1964, the same year in which his much-praised play Dutchman was staged. During the mid-1960s, Jones broke philosophically with his fellow Greenwich Village artists as he emerged as a leader in the black arts movement. In 1965, he moved to Harlem, and soon thereafter he returned to Newark, leaving his wife.
In 1966, Jones married Sylvia Robinson, an African-American woman. In 1968, he took the African name Imamu (“spiritual leader”) Ameer (“blessed”) Baraka (“prince”), prompted by his conversion to the Kawaida sect of Islam, his growing sense of black nationalism, and his appreciation of the messages of Black Muslim leader Malcolm X. He later modified “Ameer” to “Amiri.” Sylvia Robinson took the name Amina Baraka.
Throughout his life, Baraka has been involved in numerous political causes and movements, and many of his critics have pointed to his shifting allegiances. He has been a Marxist, positioned himself as a mediator between black and white intellectuals, and professed a militant anti-white stance. He has also worked in nearly every form of writing: poetry, fiction, drama, essay, autobiography, screenwriting, and literary and social criticism. Baraka’s life has also been marked by a number of confrontations with legal authorities. His first imbroglio was over a copy of his 1961 play, The Eighth Ditch, mailed to a prisoner but intercepted by prison authorities; as a result, federal authorities raided Baraka’s apartment and charged him with sending obscenity through the mail.
Baraka has taught at various institutions, including the State University of New York at Stony Brook, Columbia University, and the New School for Social Research. He has received numerous awards for his work, including an Obie Award in 1964 for Dutchman.
The Baptism is a one-act play that takes place inside a Baptist church in New York City during the early 1960s. The play opens with the Minister and the Homosexual speaking to each other and running in Page 3 | Top of Articleplace. The Minister wants to save the Homosexual’s soul, but the Homosexual is making cynical comments about the Minister and religion in general.
The Boy enters the church carrying a bag. The Minister sees him as an innocent child interested in being baptized, and the Homosexual sees him as “rough trade,” a slang term for a male prostitute who engages in violent sex acts. The Boy admits that he has committed some sins. The Homosexual attempts to distract the Boy by dropping his trousers, revealing that he is wearing red leotards. This angers the Minister, who rushes at the Homosexual. The Homosexual defends himself by saying that he is “the Son of Man” and has “done nothing not accounted for in the book of days.” These are both biblical references, and the latter may also indicate that the Homosexual believes that any act he has committed is not new or different and should therefore be acceptable. The Homosexual indicates that the Boy should not trust the Minister.
The Old Woman rushes into the church as the Homosexual and the Minister are exchanging insults, and she claims that the Boy is an “agent of the devil.” A lively discussion ensues among the Minister, the Old Woman, the Boy, and the Homosexual. The Old Woman insists that the Boy is an evil sinner and then nearly passes out in religious ecstasy; the Minister wants to forgive him; the Boy insists that he has done nothing wrong; and the Homosexual, while suggesting that the Boy could serve as his secretary, sings, dances, and throws confetti. Eventually, the Boy admits that the Old Woman must have seen him masturbating while he was praying, and he defends himself saying, “thinking of God always gives me a hard-on.”
The Homosexual tries to get the Boy to dance with him, but the Boy refuses. This refusal wins the Boy praise from the Minister, who says to the Homosexual, “This is a gifted lad. You cannot sway him with your cant about religion or the evil pleasures of the flesh.” The Old Woman starts singing an old gospel song, and the Homosexual derides her. The Minister declares the Homosexual’s words blasphemous, and they exchange insults. The Boy asks if he is now saved, but the Homosexual mocks the idea that he could be saved from anything, let alone Satan. The Homosexual sings a song about wanting to experience everything possible and again asks the Boy to dance with him. The Minister intervenes, arguing that the Boy “can
yet be saved.” The Homosexual laughs at the idea, responding sarcastically that the Boy “can yet be made sterile. Can yet be taught that blank walls yodel the crazy name of salvation.”
A chorus of about six young Women of various sizes and ethnicities enters the church singing. They wear numbers pinned to their gauzy dresses. The Old Woman is enlivened, shakes her hips, and asks the Boy to dance with her. The Boy is shocked, as is the Minister, but the Homosexual jumps in and again asks the Boy to dance with him. The Boy refuses, saying that he has already sinned and should not sin again by dancing in a church. The Homosexual laughs at his seriousness and makes fun of how upset he is for having masturbated. He asks the Boy how often he masturbates; the Boy admits that he does so each time he prays, which is three times a day. The Homosexual considers this figure and praises the Boy for his regularity.
The Minister is outraged by the Boy’s admission, but the Homosexual calls him an “old hypocrite” and accuses him of having masturbated at least as often. The Minister states that God will strike the Homosexual dead, but this only encourages the Homosexual, who begins to sing a song about how exciting it would be to get “drilled with Page 4 | Top of Articleholy lightning.” The Boy is confused at this point and asks, “What shall I do?” The Homosexual responds, “Become a Christian so you can understand the symbolism.” The Boy asks to be baptized. The Homosexual thinks that baptism “might not be such a bad idea” for himself, as he could finally see God.
The Boy demands that he be baptized immediately. Suddenly, one of the Women shouts at the Boy, “He’s the one,” and they all begin to call him “The Christ child come back.... the Son of God.... Chief Religious jelly roll of the universe.” They moan ecstatically and begin praying. The Minister and the Old Woman sink to their knees and praise the Boy, but the Homosexual is not convinced. He demands that the Boy prove he is Christ by turning the church into the White House, “or something cool like that.”
The Boy next admits that he has lied in the past to the Women about his relation to God so that they would have sex with him, but he never meant for them to think he was Christ. The Homosexual is very impressed with the Boy’s deceit, but no one else hears the admission of the trickery. Finally, the Minister realizes that the Boy has “lied merely to further [his] lust.” This angers the Minister, the Old Woman, and the Women, who now call for his punishment. Intent on killing him, the group moves toward the Boy. The Homosexual tries to block them and is kicked down to the ground unconscious. “You must be sacrificed to cleanse the soul of man,” the Minister cries out to the Boy. The Boy begs for mercy but none is offered. He pulls a sword out of the bag he has with him and kills the Women, the Minister, and the Old Woman.
Suddenly, the Messenger enters the church on a motorcycle. He is dressed in a leather jacket with the words “The Man” and a crown stenciled on the back. He asks what has happened, and the Boy answers, “I have slain these sinners.... I am the Son of Man. The Christ.” The Messenger says that he has come to retrieve the Boy, sent by “the man. Your father.” He dances a mambo step through most of the rest of the play. The Boy argues with the Messenger, noting that he was sent to save people on “this earth.” The Messenger tells the Boy that his father is angry that he has failed in his assignment and that “the man is destroying the whole works tonight. With a grenade.” The Messenger and the Boy argue over whether the Boy should be forced to leave, with the Messenger calling the Boy by the name Percy.
The Messenger finally gets tired of arguing with the Boy, hits him over the head with a tire iron, and throws him over the back of his motorcycle. After they leave, the Homosexual rises from the pile of bodies on the stage and speculates on what has happened. “Damn, it looks like some really uninteresting kind of orgy went on in here,” he says, and again suggests that the Minister should not have catered to “rough trade.” As he leaves the church, thinking about getting a drink before the bars close for the evening, he wonders, “[W]hat happened to that cute little religious fanatic?”
The Boy is described in the play’s list of characters as handsome and about fifteen years old, with a “martyr-like shyness.” He appears at the church as an innocent, asking the Minister to baptize him, but then admits to having sinned. The Homosexual is sexually interested in the Boy, and he and the Minister struggle for the Boy’s attentions. The Boy begins the play with a timid manner, but by the play’s end he is convinced that he is “the Son of Man” and “the Christ.”
The Homosexual is in his forties and (according to the list of characters) “elegant” but gaining a bit of a belly and “conscious of it.” He seems to delight in taunting the Minister with lewd suggestions and dismisses everyone in the play except the Boy, whom he finds sexually attractive. Under his trousers the Homosexual wears red leotards, which he reveals when the Boy admits to sinning. The Homosexual is an outsider and a cynic who comments under his breath about what is going on around him.
The Messenger rides a motorcycle into the church to pick up the Boy and take him away. He serves as a sort of deus ex machina—an improbable character suddenly introduced into the plot of a play, who extricates another character from a difficult situation. According to the list of characters, the Page 5 | Top of ArticleMessenger is a gaunt Spaniard or looks like the actor Lee Marvin. He wears leather pants and a jacket with a gold crown and the words “The Man” printed on the back. The Messenger is no-nonsense and does not care to listen to the Boy’s reasons as to why he should not come with him. He inexplicably calls the Boy by the name Percy a few times.
According to the play’s list of characters, the Minister is “pompous, appears well-meaning” but is “generally ridiculous.” He is an image of conventional and middle-class America—white-haired and clothed in black robes. His church is “arrogant Protestant, obviously Baptist” and somewhat financially well-off. His sermons are probably broadcast over the radio, as his pulpit carries the sign “WHBI Radio.” The Minister dislikes the Homosexual and is very interested in saving the Boy’s soul.
The Old Woman is “strong from years of the American Matriarchy” and screams most of her lines. She makes her entrance early in the play, rushing in to accuse the Boy of sinning. The Minister refers to her as “devout” and listens to her claims about the Boy, but only to a point. When the chorus of Women enters the church, she takes up their songs and performs a seductive dance during which she removes numerous skirts from her waist, layer by layer.
The Women are “young, sleek ‘Village!’ types,” according to the list of characters, referring to Greenwich Village in New York City, where many intellectuals and artists lived during the 1950s and 1960s. They number approximately six and are young and of “diverse sizes and colors.” The Women serve primarily as a chorus, entering the church singing gospel songs and wearing numbers pinned to their gauzy dresses. The Homosexual derides them, but the Old Woman finds them comforting and sings along with them. The Women are the first to refer to the Boy as “the Son of God.”
The play is a satire of organized religion; that is, Baraka is making fun of organized religion and all those who are associated with it. The story centers on a boy who enters a church, sorry for his sins and asking to be forgiven, but Baraka embellishes the tale with characters behaving in ridiculous ways. Various aspects of organized religion are lampooned in a way that launches questions about the validity of religious belief.
The typical hierarchy of religion is challenged in the play, for example. The Minister, who represents church leadership, has his position reduced when the chorus of Women announces that the Boy is Christ or Jesus. The Minister drops to his knees, kissing the Boy’s feet and praising him. As soon as the Boy admits that he lied about being Christ, the Minister turns on him and says, “May the true God strike you dead.” Confusion reigns instead of orthodoxy, and this opens up the question of what is valid and true in organized religion.
Even when the Minister and the others know that the Boy is not the true Christ, the Minister demands that he die “to cleanse the soul of man.” He states that the Boy must die “so that He should not have died for nothing.” The play then seems to turn the story of Christ’s crucifixion on its head; the Boy, as a pseudo-Christ figure, slays his accusers and is whisked away on the back of a motorcycle to “the man.”
Most plays that are set inside a church do not feature the themes of sex and sexuality, but Baraka’s does—possibly to shock but maybe also to join together two topics, religion and sex, about which Americans have varying levels of discomfort. The tone Baraka takes also indicates that he sees hypocrisy when religious authorities comment on or proscribe certain types of sexual behavior.
The prominence of sex as a theme in the play is stressed immediately; the play opens with the Homosexual and the Minister arguing over sexual preferences and promiscuity. The Homosexual dismisses the Minister’s concerns, but the Minister responds, “When you are strapped in sin, I pray for you, dear queen. I stare with X-ray eyes into your dark room and suffer with you.” Sexual preference is a major point of contention between the two characters throughout the play, as is sexual behavior. Whenever the Minister accuses the Homosexual of behaving improperly, the Homosexual assures him that his actions are really not that shocking and can be attributed to his humanness. At one point the Homosexual refers to himself as “the Son of Man,”
underscoring his association with human desire as well as with the divine, since this title was used by Christ.
Interestingly, the Homosexual questions the sexual preference and activities of the Minister on a number of occasions, indicating that he believes the Minister is a hypocrite. When the Boy appears in the church, he asks to be forgiven of his sins and “sprawls” on the floor; the Minister responds by saying the word “love” as if it is a question. The Homosexual whispers off to the side “You, sir, are an opportunist,” as if he thinks the Minister may see the Boy as something more than a prospective Christian.
The character of the Boy is surrounded by sexual references. The sin for which he seeks forgiveness when he first enters the church is masturbation. Later, he admits to lying to the chorus of Women about his identity so that he could sleep with them. They had been praising the Boy for being “the Son of God. Our holy husband,” moaning that he had “popped us in those various hallways of love and blessed us with the beauty of Jehovah.” However, when they hear him say that he is not Christ, they are angry at being deceived. “We wanted to be virgins of the Lord. He lied,” they chant together.
The struggle to control human sexual desires and “the flesh” is preeminent in the play and provides the major source of hypocrisy for Baraka’s characters. Only the Homosexual is uninhibited and straightforward about what he wants. He asks to experience everything and does not want to be “saved” from anything. “I want it all,” he says. “I want to know it. See it.... Feel it, if it comes to that.” The Minister and the others are not so sure. When they think that the Boy is Christ and has slept with the chorus of Women to “save” them, they find him acceptable. When he admits, however, to having lied to satisfy his human desires, they become enraged and attempt murder.
The play is accomplished in one act and takes place in one scene at a Baptist church. Numerous characters enter and leave, but the action takes place in only one location.
Baraka uses a chorus, a classical technique favored by the ancient Greeks in which a group of Page 7 | Top of Articlepeople sing or chant important parts of a play. Often, the chorus was used to mark the parts of the play, commenting on what the audience had just seen or was about to see. In Baraka’s play, the six or so Women are a chorus, singing bits of old gospel songs and praising the Boy when they think he is Christ. The Minister claims responsibility for the chorus of Women, calling them “my usherettes.” The use of the chorus recalls traditional forms of drama, but it also lends an almost comic air to the play.
Baraka has created characters that are not unique individuals but are more like representations of particular groups or belief systems. The characters are given titles, not personal names that might disguise the messages Baraka wants to deliver through their actions and words. For example, the characterization of the Homosexual is rather stereotypical—as are most of the other characterizations—with Baraka describing him as “very queenly” and overly concerned with his and other characters’ appearances. The Minister is patriarchal, with silver hair and a rigid sense of respectability. The Old Woman, according to Baraka, is “strong from years of the American Matriarchy.” She is accustomed to giving orders and dictating moral responsibility.
Satire and Humor
Baraka makes fun of everyone and everything in his play by satirizing religion and all those associated with it. From the opening moments of the play, Baraka sends the message that much of what his characters are saying is ridiculous; they dance, sing silly songs, jump on one leg, take a mambo step, and even drop their pants. Baraka’s use of humor reflects his desire that organized religion be exposed for what he considers are its absurdities and hypocrisies.
The Homosexual’s dropping his pants to expose red leotards brings the action close to slapstick. This is not the only place where Baraka uses this kind of humor. After listening to the Boy proclaim his holy mission and demand to be left on earth, the Messenger has had enough and hits him over the head with a tire iron.
Occasionally, the language in the play shifts to a kind of street talk in which the characters use obscene words or informal phrasing. Baraka’s use of these techniques supports the general satiric tone of the play, encouraging a light atmosphere around subjects usually addressed in seriousness.
For example, after listening to the Minister use formal language to condemn the Boy for his deceitfulness, the Homosexual says, “Oh, don’t ham everything up,” relieving the tension of the moment. When the Messenger explains to the Boy that they must leave immediately, the tone and pacing of his language sounds like jazz music: “Sorry baby. Can’t make it.... Jump on the back of the cycle and we’ll split.” The Messenger is making light of the Boy’s extreme demands that he “perish” and “suffer” with those on earth that he was sent to “save.”
Bohemians and the Beat Movement in New York City
Baraka’s writing and thinking was influenced during the late 1950s and early 1960s by a group of artists and intellectuals often referred to as the Beats or Bohemians. While many of the movement’s participants considered San Francisco their home base, a large number of these artists also spent time in New York City’s Greenwich Village while Baraka lived there. Gregory Corso, Charles Olson, Frank O’Hara, and Allen Ginsberg—who electrified the literary world in 1955 with his experimental poem “Howl” in San Francisco—lived in and visited Greenwich Village at various times.
The Beats rebelled against typical middle-class American values through their art and rejected the conventional in all that they came across. They experimented with the form and content of poetry and prose, relying on intuition and emotions to tell them when a piece was finished. They chafed against post-World War II conformity; William S. Burroughs and Ginsberg were open about their experimental drug use, and those who were homosexual were quite candid about it.
Struggle for Civil Rights in the 1950s and 1960s
During the 1950s and early 1960s, Amiri Baraka lived and wrote in a world in which blacks were
largely considered second-class citizens and did not enjoy many of the same legal protections as whites. For example, until a number of court cases struck down segregation of the races in the United States, blacks were barred or restricted—sometimes by state law—from a variety of public venues, such as restaurants, neighborhoods, golf courses, schools, and movie theaters. In the second half of the 1950s, the Supreme Court handed down a series of decisions invalidating the segregation of golf courses, swimming pools, and beaches.
From the late 1950s through the 1960s, some African Americans and supportive whites engaged in civil rights demonstrations, often risking their lives in the effort. Many of the demonstrations were met with violence, such as the 1963 confrontation between police and activists in Birmingham, Alabama. The local police commissioner responded to the largely peaceful demonstration by releasing dogs and using cattle prods against the civil rights protesters.
One of the largest civil rights demonstrations of that era was the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, led by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Nearly a quarter-million Americans of varying backgrounds gathered in front of the Washington Monument to hear King deliver his now-famous “I Have a Dream” speech.
While the civil rights movement grew, and after a 1960 trip to Fidel Castro’s Cuba, Baraka became increasingly more politically radical. During Page 9 | Top of Articlethe early 1960s, Baraka became disillusioned with the apolitical attitude of the white experimental artists he worked with in Greenwich Village. He finally broke with them in 1965, after the assassination of Malcolm X. He moved to Harlem and then Newark, declaring that he was interested primarily in black cultural efforts such as jazz and theater written for black audiences. In Newark, he launched the Black Arts Repertory Theater-School.
Critical reception of Baraka’s work varies widely from enthusiastic praise to equally enthusiastic condemnation. William J. Harris, in the introduction to The LeRoi Jones/Amiri Baraka Reader, suggests that the reason for this disparity may lie in the various modes and influences of the writer’s energy and creativity. According to Harris, Baraka “is an avant-garde writer whose variety of forms... makes him difficult to categorize, while his stormy history clouds critical objectivity.”
To get a handle on Baraka’s efforts, many critics have divided his work into three or four periods. Harris sees Baraka’s work falling into four periods: the “Beat Period,” from 1957 to 1962, during which he was influenced by white avant-garde artists such as Allen Ginsberg; the “Transitional Period,” from 1963 to 1965, during which Baraka wrote The Baptism and became increasingly disillusioned with white society; the “Black Nationalist Period,” from 1965 to 1974, during which Baraka argued that blacks in America constituted a distinct nation; and the “Third World Marxist Period,” from 1974 through today, during which the author has embraced international socialism and rejected black nationalism.
While freely admitting that classifying Baraka is difficult, Theodore C. Hudson refers to Baraka as a romantic in his From LeRoi Jones to Amiri Baraka. Baraka “places great faith in intuition, in feelings” and also believes that “man is divine,” argues Hudson, who also writes that Baraka’s romantic approach to art shows itself when he is “disdainful of the organized and orthodox religion of the majority”—a thematic element that defines The Baptism.
Like most of Baraka’s work, The Baptism has received mixed responses. Tish Dace and Andrew O. Jones, writing in the Reference Guide to American Literature, note that the play garnered charges of “obscenity and blasphemy” while it “jarred and amused” those who went to see its opening in 1964. James A. Miller, writing in the Dictionary of Literary Biography Volume 16: The Beats, criticizes the play for its incomplete structure and substance. He argues that the play “lacks a clear dramatic focus and is heavily dependant upon the shock value of irreverent attitudes for its effects.” Miller also notes, however, that Baraka was “clearly indebted” to the writings of French playwright Jean Genet and to others who wrote in the style of the “theater of the absurd.” Absurdist theater typically abandons traditional dramatic devices, such as logical plot development and dialogue, and replaces them with a sense of confusion and unreality.
Praise for the play centers on its challenging message. According to Catherine Daniels Hurst in the Dictionary of Literary Biography Volume 7: Twentieth-Century American Dramatists, The Baptism is a prime example of Baraka’s concern with the themes of “personal identity, self-actualization, and appearance versus reality.” Hurst also asserts that Baraka has effectively interwoven “setting, character, and theme” in the play. She calls it a “modern fable” and a “satirical indictment of religious perversion.” Beyond her general praise for the play, however, Hurst questions Baraka’s use of profanity and obscenity and doubts whether Baraka’s message can be interpreted properly when it is in “such an unpalatable form.” C. W. E. Bigsby echoes this concern in his Confrontation and Commitment: A Study of Contemporary American Drama, noting, “it is precisely his failure to communicate which ironically constitutes the greatest weakness of his work.”
Critics have noted Baraka’s innovative use of language; this technique appears throughout The Baptism. Dace and Jones see in his early work “techniques analogous to black music—jazz and the blues.” Hudson observes that Baraka uses humor and satire as a major technique—a method very broadly used in The Baptism. Baraka’s satire is “informed by a certain hip, or superior, sensibility, by an urbane sensibility developed in street lore, [and] by a contempt born of too much perception,” according to Hudson.
While Baraka has received his fair share of negative press for his shifting views and his sometimes extreme political statements, most critics agree Page 10 | Top of Articlethat he is an important twentieth-century writer. “Although he has often expressed disdain for the literary establishment,” notes Miller, “[Baraka’s] work has clearly defined him as a major intellectual presence.”
Sanderson holds a master of fine arts degree in fiction writing and is an independent writer. In this essay, Sanderson examines the role of the Homosexual in Amiri Baraka’s play The Baptism.
Amiri Baraka wrote The Baptism when he was still known as LeRoi Jones and was immersed in the bohemian life of New York City’s Greenwich Village. All around him were artists, intellectuals, and members of the beat movement—primarily young white men, who rejected the values of middle-class American society; experimented with nontraditional artistic forms, mind-altering drugs, and Eastern religions; and openly challenged traditional sexual sensibilities. The play definitely shows evidence of Baraka’s exposure to other avant-garde writers: its language is peppered with street lingo and profanity, social institutions are lampooned, and the very content and meaning of the story are in question. Who is the Boy? Is he really Christ or just a clever street punk? Why are all of these people at the church? Why does the Messenger inexplicably arrive at the end of the play to take the Boy away—and where is he taken?
While these questions cannot be completely answered without directly querying the author, an examination of the character of the Homosexual can help reveal some of the intent of the play. This must be done, however, with extreme caution, as Theodore C. Hudson advises in his book From LeRoi Jones to Amiri Baraka. “To look only for rational, conscious, and ordered style in Jones’s work is to subvert explication and to beg for a misreading or a nonreading,” he warns. Nevertheless, the character of the Homosexual is a compelling one. He opens the play, deeply involved in an argument about sexual preference and sin with the Minister, and he has the final say in the play, rising from the pile of bodies on the stage to head off to a bar. “What ever happened to that cute little religious fanatic?” he wonders aloud, pausing for a moment to think about the Boy.
Like all of the other characters, the Homosexual is a stock character, the stereotype of a homosexual. He strikes effeminate poses throughout the play and works to attract the Boy’s attention. The other characters also stand for ideas or groups and do not have any unique qualities that make them individuals. They have no names or personal histories. The Minister, for example, with his gray hair, black robes, and stern demeanor, is the image of authority. The Old Woman similarly projects authority with her loud voice and advanced age, but she also represents, as Baraka conveniently mentions in the list of characters, “the American Matriarchy.” The Women are, according to the list of characters, “sleek ‘Village!’ types,” probably representative of many of the women Baraka met while living in Greenwich Village—highly educated and smart but very focused on the next popular trend. In Baraka’s eyes, they must have been as similar to one another as are the Women in the play, who are distinguished only by the numbers pinned on their chests.
While Hudson’s warnings about “ordered style” in Baraka’s work are valuable, he misses his own point when it comes to interpreting the message behind homosexual characters in Baraka’s work—at least within this play. Hudson argues that in Baraka’s work, “homosexuality... may be considered as broadly symbolic of misuse of creative energies, as a deliberate turning from what is natural and good... as an avoidance of reality.” In The Baptism, though, the Homosexual, however stereotypical Baraka has made him, has something the rest of the characters do not have: a keen sense of humor. This, along with his ability to survey a situation and call it as he sees it, sets him apart from the rest of the characters. Contrary to Hudson’s assertions, the Homosexual is the character most connected to reality and most open to creative energy.
The Homosexual is the outsider, literally and figuratively. He is outside the mainstream of American life by his sexual choices and preferences. The Minister accuses the Homosexual of being “less selective” than he himself is when it comes to sexual partners, and at one point he calls upon God to punish the Homosexual. The Homosexual is also often outside of the play’s action and in a position where he can comment about what is going on without being heard. When the Boy appears in the church, for example, the Homosexual makes a side comment that the Minister is “an opportunist.” Numerous times he asks another character a question or makes a demand but gets no answer, as if he is not there. When the Boy is declared to be Christ,
the Homosexual asks him to prove it by turning the church “into the White House or something cool like that,” but no one responds to this challenge.
In his position as an outsider, the Homosexual can make sharp and perceptive comments about what he sees happening in the church. This is something no one else is able to do, as they are all busy either condemning the Boy for his sins or praising him when they think he is Christ. In fact, throughout most of the play, the tone of the other characters is often hysterical and fanatical. The Homosexual, on the other hand, is able to stand back and provide an analysis of the situation while remaining in touch with his sense of humor. When the Old Woman finishes her rant about the Boy’s masturbation, she falls to the ground. The Minister sees her actions through the lens of his religious beliefs, stating, “She has swooned in the service of the Lord. A holy ecstasy has entered her soul.” The Homosexual is not so sure about the Minister’s interpretation. He turns over her limp body with his toe and muses to himself, “Hmm, I think maybe she’s had a bit too much to drink.”
The Homosexual reconsiders nearly everything he sees in the church, and no experience is closed to him—except, of course, the experience of true belief. He reacts quickly when the Minister and the Boy speak of being saved from sin, inquiring of himself why he should want to be saved. “And miss something? No, not me. I want it all,” he says, and notes that he wants to feel, see, and know whatever is possible. If rejecting Satan means he will have to pass up an experience, count him out. When the Minister threatens to have his Lord strike the Homosexual dead, the Homosexual is even open to the possibility of that experience. “That’s okay. It never happened before. It might be a gas. I mean drilled with the holy lightning,” he says, and begins singing, “Drill me baby. Drill me so I don’t need to be drilled no more.”
Contrary to Hudson’s general interpretation of Baraka’s use of homosexuals in his work, the Homosexual in The Baptism is a perceptive outsider who questions all that he sees but is open to nearly every encounter and experience. He suspects hypocrisy but is flexible enough to admit that lies are
sometimes desirable—especially when they possible more physical experiences. In addition, he delivers his evaluation of society and its participants with a sense of humor and a sharp wit. Far from drawing a negative character, Baraka has, in fact, depicted the Homosexual as the idealized Village bohemian or avant-garde artist.
Like the Homosexual, Baraka’s fellow Greenwich Village residents saw it as their job to persistently challenge social institutions, such as organized religion. They purposely placed themselves outside of middle-class America to have a better view of its hypocrisy. Humor and absurdity were tools they could use to poke fun at what they perceived as Middle America’s mindless rigidity and unwillingness to experience all of life.
Granted, Baraka would soon reject much of bohemian and beat philosophy in favor of a more radical black activism, but for the time being he sought to praise what he saw as the obvious solution to a mindless, cookie-cutter existence. The Homosexual, representing bohemian ideals, is, after all, the last man standing in the play. Its apocalyptic climax has been, for him, simply one more experience.
Source: Susan Sanderson, Critical Essay on The Baptism, in Drama for Students, The Gale Group, 2003.
Bigsby, C. W. E., “LeRoi Jones,” in Confrontation and Commitment: A Study of Contemporary American Drama, 1959–1966, University of Missouri Press, 1968, pp. 138–55.
Dace, Tish, and Andrew O. Jones, “Baraka, Amiri,” in Reference Guide to American Literature, 3d ed., edited by Jim Kamp, St. James Press, 1994.
Harris, William J., “Introduction,” in The LeRoi Jones/Amiri Baraka Reader, edited by William J. Harris, Thunder’s Mouth Press, 1991, pp. xvii–xxx.
Hudson, Theodore C., From LeRoi Jones to Amiri Baraka: The Literary Works, Duke University Press, 1973, pp. 59, 65–66,178–80.
Hurst, Catherine Daniels, “Amiri Baraka,” in Dictionary of Literary Biography, Vol. 7: Twentieth-Century American Dramatists, edited by John MacNichols, Gale Research, 1981, pp. 49–56.
Jones, LeRoi, The Baptism and the Toilet, Grove Press, New York, 1967.
Miller, James A., “Amiri Baraka,” in Dictionary of Literary Biography, Vol. 16: The Beats: Literary Bohemians in Postwar America, edited by Ann Charters, The Gale Group, 1983, pp. 3–24.
Bigsby, C. W. E., A Critical Introduction to Twentieth Century American Drama: Beyond Broadway, Vol. 3, Cambridge University Press, 1985.
This book covers the period in American drama immediately after Baraka’s productions of The Baptism and Dutchman and serves as an introduction to how American theater changed dramatically during the 1960s and 1970s. The author focuses on the work that was being done in the smaller, less mainstream theaters commonly referred to as off-Broadway, as well as the ground-breaking work accomplished by playwrights such as Sam Shepard and David Mamet.
Jones, Hettie, How I Became Hettie Jones, E. P. Dutton, 1990.
Hettie Jones, Amiri Baraka’s wife when he was LeRoi Jones, remembers her interracial marriage to the famous writer. She also writes about the beginnings of her life as a child in a middle-class Jewish household in the Queens section of New York City, and about the various members of the Beat movement whom she and her ex-husband called friends in the 1950s and 1960s.
Oliver, Clinton F., and Stephanie Sills, Contemporary Black Drama: From “A Raisin in the Sun” to “No Place to Be Somebody,” Charles Schribner’s Sons, 1971.
This volume features plays from many of the leading black playwrights of the late 1950s through the late 1960s, including Lorraine Hansberry, Adrienne Kennedy, James Baldwin, and LeRoi Jones. Each play is preceded by an introductory essay to the playwright and the play.
Watts, Jerry Gafio, Amiri Baraka: The Politics and Art of a Black Intellectual, New York University Press, 2001.
The author dissects the intellectual and artistic journey taken by Baraka from the late 1950s through the 1980s, covering the controversial writer’s life from his Beat movement days to his more recent Marxist period.
Gale Document Number: GALE|CX2694100012